<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fahrenheit 451&#8230; Book burning as done by lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/</link>
	<description>Enclosing the Commons of the Mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 04:40:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion. But remember one thing: many, many books written after 1922 but before 1964 are in the public domain, because the copyrights were never renewed.

The automatic renewal only applies to post-1963 works. Before that, if they weren&#039;t renewed after their first 28 years, that&#039;s too bad-- they&#039;re in the PD. And as for films and TV, pre-1964, if they were not registered and deposited with the Library of Congress, they could NOT be renewed until that was done.

So, a mere notice on one of these works-- or someone now claiming that they were previously unpublished, so they are copyrighting it now-- is not valid. They are in the full PD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion. But remember one thing: many, many books written after 1922 but before 1964 are in the public domain, because the copyrights were never renewed.</p>
<p>The automatic renewal only applies to post-1963 works. Before that, if they weren&#8217;t renewed after their first 28 years, that&#8217;s too bad&#8211; they&#8217;re in the PD. And as for films and TV, pre-1964, if they were not registered and deposited with the Library of Congress, they could NOT be renewed until that was done.</p>
<p>So, a mere notice on one of these works&#8211; or someone now claiming that they were previously unpublished, so they are copyrighting it now&#8211; is not valid. They are in the full PD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upphovsfel &#171; Full Mental Straightjacket</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Upphovsfel &#171; Full Mental Straightjacket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-937</guid>
		<description>[...] i att 98% av alla upphovsrättsbelagda inte är tillgängliga för att man inte vet vem som har rättigheterna till dem. Samma problem finns i Europa och Sverige, men allt eftersom upphovsrättstiden utökats så har [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] i att 98% av alla upphovsrättsbelagda inte är tillgängliga för att man inte vet vem som har rättigheterna till dem. Samma problem finns i Europa och Sverige, men allt eftersom upphovsrättstiden utökats så har [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transformation Remix, oder: Maschinengeschichten &#124; Werbeblogger &#8211; Weblog über Marketing, Werbung und PR &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Transformation Remix, oder: Maschinengeschichten</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Transformation Remix, oder: Maschinengeschichten &#124; Werbeblogger &#8211; Weblog über Marketing, Werbung und PR &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Transformation Remix, oder: Maschinengeschichten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-917</guid>
		<description>[...] Namen. Und aktuell nicht nur zentrales Element der Kultur, sondern auch des Kulturkampfes gegen repressives und infinites Copyright — in welchem wir uns, gesellschaftlich und individuell, die Rechte an unserer eigenen Kultur [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Namen. Und aktuell nicht nur zentrales Element der Kultur, sondern auch des Kulturkampfes gegen repressives und infinites Copyright — in welchem wir uns, gesellschaftlich und individuell, die Rechte an unserer eigenen Kultur [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wizard Prang</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizard Prang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-911</guid>
		<description>@Crosbie,

&quot;Copyright is an unethical 18th century anachronism to be ignored by anyone who recognises the individual’s natural right to liberty and the injustice of privilege that suspends it.&quot;

No. Just... no.

Copyright is a necessary compromise between the culture and the creative. 

It is intended to give the creative enough reward to produce more creative stuff. Take that away and many creators will stop creating.

Or, to put it another way, it should allow the creative to do anything, but not enough for them to do nothing.

The problem is that it has gone way too far in the other direction. The copyright mob sound like Gollum: &quot;It&#039;s ours forever, my precious..!&quot; Somebody needs to tell these folks &quot;NO&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Crosbie,</p>
<p>&#8220;Copyright is an unethical 18th century anachronism to be ignored by anyone who recognises the individual’s natural right to liberty and the injustice of privilege that suspends it.&#8221;</p>
<p>No. Just&#8230; no.</p>
<p>Copyright is a necessary compromise between the culture and the creative. </p>
<p>It is intended to give the creative enough reward to produce more creative stuff. Take that away and many creators will stop creating.</p>
<p>Or, to put it another way, it should allow the creative to do anything, but not enough for them to do nothing.</p>
<p>The problem is that it has gone way too far in the other direction. The copyright mob sound like Gollum: &#8220;It&#8217;s ours forever, my precious..!&#8221; Somebody needs to tell these folks &#8220;NO&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-909</guid>
		<description>All published works are in the public domain.

Copyright is an unethical 18th century anachronism to be ignored by anyone who recognises the individual&#039;s natural right to liberty and the injustice of privilege that suspends it.

By copying and improving upon each other&#039;s work is how Homo Sapiens has progressed for aeons. To submit to the corrupt legislation that prohibits it is a dereliction of one&#039;s duty to mankind.

Share and build upon mankind&#039;s cultural heritage without fear or hesitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All published works are in the public domain.</p>
<p>Copyright is an unethical 18th century anachronism to be ignored by anyone who recognises the individual&#8217;s natural right to liberty and the injustice of privilege that suspends it.</p>
<p>By copying and improving upon each other&#8217;s work is how Homo Sapiens has progressed for aeons. To submit to the corrupt legislation that prohibits it is a dereliction of one&#8217;s duty to mankind.</p>
<p>Share and build upon mankind&#8217;s cultural heritage without fear or hesitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 января &#8211; день Public Domain. С прошедшим праздником! &#124; Электронные книги</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>1 января &#8211; день Public Domain. С прошедшим праздником! &#124; Электронные книги</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-863</guid>
		<description>[...] Groups around the world are using Public Domain Day as a way to explain the effects of our copyright system on our collective culture. &#160; (Communia’s site and the Public Domain Works registry deserve special attention.)&#160; ) &#160; For more details about Public Domain Day&#160; go to the Center for the Study of the Public Domain’s Public Domain Day Website, or visit our Frequently Asked Questions page.&#160; And happy Public Domain Day, and Happy New Year, to all of you.  Статья Джеймса Бойла о вреде 70-тилетнего срока копирайта thepublicdomain.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Groups around the world are using Public Domain Day as a way to explain the effects of our copyright system on our collective culture. &nbsp; (Communia’s site and the Public Domain Works registry deserve special attention.)&nbsp; ) &nbsp; For more details about Public Domain Day&nbsp; go to the Center for the Study of the Public Domain’s Public Domain Day Website, or visit our Frequently Asked Questions page.&nbsp; And happy Public Domain Day, and Happy New Year, to all of you.  Статья Джеймса Бойла о вреде 70-тилетнего срока копирайта thepublicdomain.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Topp and the Big Bad Blog &#187; The morning coffee is lacking pants</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Topp and the Big Bad Blog &#187; The morning coffee is lacking pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-860</guid>
		<description>[...] burning might be out of fashion, but thepublicdomain.org argues here that gradual changes to copyright law over the past fifty years are accomplishing the same [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] burning might be out of fashion, but thepublicdomain.org argues here that gradual changes to copyright law over the past fifty years are accomplishing the same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fahrenheit 451… Book burning as done by lawyers &#8211; Critical Flare</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Fahrenheit 451… Book burning as done by lawyers &#8211; Critical Flare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-857</guid>
		<description>[...] Fahrenheit 451… Book burning as done by lawyers  Fahrenheit 451… Book burning as done by lawyers: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fahrenheit 451… Book burning as done by lawyers  Fahrenheit 451… Book burning as done by lawyers: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illinois Press Book Blog &#187; Copyright and Orphaned Works</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Illinois Press Book Blog &#187; Copyright and Orphaned Works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-856</guid>
		<description>[...] use but with no author or estate to uphold the responsibilities of ownership. The result, as The Public Domain spells out, is a sort of 20th century cultural black hole in which practical access to almost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] use but with no author or estate to uphold the responsibilities of ownership. The result, as The Public Domain spells out, is a sort of 20th century cultural black hole in which practical access to almost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Il copyright che protegge, il copyright che brucia e la fragilit</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2009/12/31/fahrenheit-451-book-burning-as-done-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>Il copyright che protegge, il copyright che brucia e la fragilit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicdomain.org/?p=1194#comment-855</guid>
		<description>[...] Doctorow su Boing Boing riprende un articolo in cui Jamie Boyle denuncia i lati oscuri delle leggi sul copyright. In particolare, gli effetti [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doctorow su Boing Boing riprende un articolo in cui Jamie Boyle denuncia i lati oscuri delle leggi sul copyright. In particolare, gli effetti [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

