Great hour long radio show on net neutrality from NPR’s The State of Things. Me, the inimitable Paul Jones of iBiblio, and Ryan Radia of the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Frank Stasio is just a great interviewer. Listen to it here. I like the way the conversation started with the 4 freedoms (a wider definition of net neutrality than I would have used) and ranged through the following topics: why should we care about net neutrality? (Jones “explaining it to people is like explaining water to fish: its what we’ve got” I would add, its like explaining water to fish when there is a drought coming.) ISP market structure, the reasons for oligopoly, rights of way regulation, the DMCA’s effects on true innovation in handsets, the times when regulation is needed, and comparisons to financial regulation, the railway cartels, the East India company and more.
From the Blog
The Prosecution of Aaron: A Response to Orin Kerr
The Hargreaves Review
Keith Aoki — A Remembrance Book
Now THAT is how you teach a class
RIP, Keith Aoki
The Future of the Constitution?
Presumed Guilty
Waiting for ‘Waiting for Godot’
Fantasy & Reality in Intellectual Property Policy
CBC Radio Interview on the History of Copyright
EFF Pioneer Award Video
EFF Party in San Francisco!
Net Neutrality Debate
Op Art Comic in todays SF Chronicle
Why I Miss Justice Blackmun…
Why We Need a Digital Civil Society
Who Steals the Gene from Off the Common
What if the Web Really Worked For Science?
Is Google Naive, Crafty or Stupid?
Video of ORGCON keynote
Er… Bigfoot? Really?
Monopolists of the Genetic Code?
Public Lectures in Lisbon and Florence
NPR’s “On The Media” Interview: The Birthday of ©
The Next Bad Thing?
Recent Posts
- The Prosecution of Aaron: A Response to Orin Kerr
- The Hargreaves Review
- Keith Aoki — A Remembrance Book
- Now THAT is how you teach a class
- RIP, Keith Aoki
- The Future of the Constitution?
- Presumed Guilty
- Waiting for ‘Waiting for Godot’
- Fantasy & Reality in Intellectual Property Policy
- CBC Radio Interview on the History of Copyright
- EFF Pioneer Award Video
- EFF Party in San Francisco!
- Net Neutrality Debate
- Op Art Comic in todays SF Chronicle
- Why I Miss Justice Blackmun…
Archived Posts
- January 2013 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (1)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- September 2009 (3)
- August 2009 (8)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (2)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (5)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (9)
- November 2008 (2)
- October 2008 (1)




I have been following the debate over net neutrality for years and I see one thing missing from the debate: what exactly is the role of the ISPs? Are they operating a private network or a public network?
I explore the topic in the following post: http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/186-186/4184-net-neutrality-is-a-ruse
The summary? ISPs are common carriers even if they aren’t classified as such by the FCC, they *act* like common carriers in their role. When questioned on the topic, ISPs don’t like to admit that, particularly if the other half of their business involves content. You know, like the cable companies.
Once we start admitting that *anyone* who puts their private network for hire to ferry bits from the public network to their private customers is a common carrier, the rights and responsibilities of those involved becomes far more clear.