Tom Bell thinks © extensions are Mickey Mouse..

Tom Bell is a thoughtful and provocative copyright scholar whose work I follow with interest.  On Technoliberation, he has a nice graph showing

a.) the astounding term extensions over the history of copyright in the United States and b.) the way in which they track potential expiration dates for one particular Mickey Mouse cartoon — Steamboat Willie.

Tom Bells graph of copyright term extensions

Tom Bell's graph of copyright term extensions

What Tom knows, but the casual viewer may not, is that while this graph is quite correct it actually dramatically understates the extent to which the effective length of copyright has been extended and does so in two distinct ways.

1.)  For most of American history, copyright has been given in renewable increments.  14 years, renewable for another 14.  28 years, renewable for another 28 and so on.  Tom’s graph shows the maximum possible length of copyright at any given time — and does so quite correctly.  But if we asked, “what was the median length of actual copyright during that period?” we would have a very different graph.  We know that when we finally abandoned the benign practice of renewable terms, 85% of copyright holders were not bothering to renew their works for the second term.  Thus, the effective length of copyright for the majority of copyrighted culture was actually half what Tom shows.  14 years in 1790 and so on.

2.)  The proportion of culture covered by Tom’s graph changes by several orders of magnitude.  Until the 1976 Copyright Act we actually required some formalities before you received a copyright.  Those formalities differed through time, but at least this could be said — your work was not copyrighted unless you gave some indication that you wanted it to be (though the requirements of that indication were different).  For example, you might have to write “Copyright 1970 James Boyle.”  This meant that copyright was an opt in scheme.  But after the 1976 Act came into force, copyright was an opt out scheme, and it was hard to opt out.  (When we founded Creative Commons, and asked the copyright office how they would recommend putting a work into the public domain, they said “we don’t provide that service.”)  What did that mean?  Suddenly, all fixed original expression was sucked into copyright, whether you wanted it to be or not.  Copyright’s domain increased many hundred fold — in ways that have dramatically impoverished our archival heritage.  All those great home movies, journals, neighbourhood newspapers — they are all copyrighted for 95 years or the life of the author plus 70 years.  And since we can’t find the authors — they are effectively locked away.  We are the first generation that has managed to deny our own culture to ourselves.  No work created during your lifetime will, without conscious action by its creator, become available for you to build upon freely without permission or fee.  Its a cultural outrage.

Combine those two factors and what do you have?  If one looked at effective length of copyright for most works, one would find that a.) for most of American history the vast majority of most potentially copyrightable works weren’t under copyright at all  and b.)  that, of the tiny, tiny  percentage that were, the vast majority went into the public domain at the expiration of their first term.  Combine those two factors and the line on the graph becomes dramatically steeper.  In fact, it makes Everest look like the Netherlands. We have dragged all of culture into copyright, and kept it there even if the owners wouldn’t have wanted to renew.  So, bad as it is, Tom’s graph actually understates the reality.

Friday, August 7th, 2009 Creative Commons, Culture, Uncategorized

3 Comments to Tom Bell thinks © extensions are Mickey Mouse..

  1. Excellent points, both, Jamie! I wholly agree that the graph underestimates the growth in the duration of copyrights in actual practice. I originally pondering trying to illustrate the renewal term, too, but decided it would have unduly complicated the graph. It would prove wonderfully evocative, though, if I could somehow quantify and trace with a single line the effective median copyright term per copyrightable work over time. That would, I think, capture both of the effects you describe.

  2. Tom W. Bell on August 7th, 2009
  3. No, I think it was a really useful graph. There’s a constant war between clarity and completeness. I am very much aware of it since I am now writing a comic book about the history of musical borrowing and what it tells us about norms, law, markets and technology…. That turns out to be a somewhat complex topic.
    We all aspire to this
    Tufte called it “the best graphic ever” — but personally I’ve never come close.

  4. James Boyle on August 7th, 2009
  5. [...] for individuals and 95 years for corporations; and once 95 years is up, Disney will ask Congress to have it extended to again, and so [...]

  6. Taking Shakespeare to court — Struts and Frets: Kris Joseph on October 19th, 2009

From the Blog

  • Mark Twain on the Need for Perpetual Copyright

    This is the second in a series of postings of material drawn from our forthcoming, Creative Commons licensed, open coursebook on Intellectual Property.  The first was Victor Hugo: Guardian of the Public Domain The book will be released in late August.

    In 1906, Samuel Clemens (who we remember better by his pen name Mark Twain) addressed Congress on the reform of the Copyright Act.  Delicious.

  • Victor Hugo: Guardian of the Public Domain

    Jennifer Jenkins and I are frantically working to put together a new open casebook on Intellectual Property Law.  (It will be available, in beta version, this Fall under a CC license, and freely downloadable in multiple formats of course.  Plus it should sell in paper form for about $130 less than the competing casebooks. The accompanying statutory supplement will be 1/5  the price of most statutory supplements — also freely downloadable.)  More about that later.  While assembling the materials for a casebook, one gets to revisit the archives, reread the great writers.  Today I was revisiting Victor Hugo.  Hugo was a fabulous — inspiring, passionate — proponent of the rights of authors, and the connection of those rights to free expression and free ideas.

  • “We Need To Start Seeing Other Futures..”

    Today is the second day of “Copyright Week!” Talk about a lede. That sentence has all the inherent excitement of “Periodontal Health Awareness Week” or “‘Hug Your Proctologist! No, After He’s Washed His Hands’ Week.” And that’s a shame. Copyright Week is a week devoted to our relationship with our own culture. Hint: things aren’t going well. The relationship is on the rocks.

  • Discussion: “The Foolish War Against Song-Lyric Websites”

    Professor Alex Sayf Cummings, author of a fascinating book called Democracy of Sound: Music Piracy and the Remaking of American Copyright in the 20th Century (recommended as a  thought-provoking read)  has an interesting  post up about attempts to shut down music lyric sites such as

  • The Top Ten List of a Conference Planner

    Academics (and others) arrange conferences.  Perfectly normal people are invited to those conferences to speak.  Most of them are just as charming as can be… but then there are the special ones.  This Top 10 List of the special people one has to respond to is devoted to all conference planners everywhere.  Hold your heads up high.  After this, purgatory should be a snap.

  • (EM)I Has A Dream

    EM(I) Has A DreamAugust 28th, 2013 is the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. The copyright in the speech is administered by EMI, with the consent of the King family. Thus the speech may not be freely played on video or reproduced and costlessly distributed across the nation — even today. Its transient appearance depends on the copyright owner’s momentary sufferance, not public right. It may disappear from your video library tomorrow. It has even been licensed to advertise commercial products, including cars and mobile phone plans.

  • The Prosecution of Aaron: A Response to Orin Kerr

    Aaron Swartz committed suicide last week.  He was 26, a genius and my friend.  Not a really good friend, but someone I had worked with off and on for 11 years, liked a lot, had laughed with frequently, occasionally shaken my head over and deeply admired.

  • The Hargreaves Review

    An Intellectual Property System for the Internet Age

    James Boyle

    In November 2010, the Prime Minister commissioned a review of the Britain’s intellectual property laws and their effect on economic growth, quoting the founders of Google that “they could never have started their company in Britain” because of a lack of flexibility in British copyright..  Mr. Cameron wanted to see if we could have UK intellectual property laws “fit for the Internet age.”   Today the Review will be published. Its conclusion?  “Could it be true that laws designed more than three centuries ago with the express purpose of creating economic incentives for innovation by protecting creators’ rights are today obstructing innovation and economic growth?  The short answer is: yes.” Those words are from Professor Ian Hargreaves, head of the Review.   (Full disclosure: I was on the Review’s panel of expert advisors.)

  • Keith Aoki — A Remembrance Book

    A slideshow and downloadable book remembering Keith in words and pictures.  You can order a glossy, high quality copy of the book itself here from Createspace or here from Amazon.  We tried to make it as beautiful as something Keith would create.  We failed. But we came close; have a look at how striking it is… all because of Keith’s art.

  • Now THAT is how you teach a class

  • RIP, Keith Aoki

    Our friend, colleague, co-author and brilliant artist and scholar Keith Aoki died yesterday in his house in Sacramento.  He was 55 years old.

  • The Future of the Constitution?

    The Brookings Institution has organized a volume on “The Future of the Constitution” edited by Jeff Rosen and Benjamin Wittes and featuring articles by me, Larry Lessig, Jonathan Zittrain, Tim Wu and many others.  How will our constitutional tradition deal with the challenges posed by new technologies?  The topics range from possible personhood claims by artificial intelligences, to the future of free speech and the Net, to neuroscience and criminal punishment.  The essays are freely available online. Details after the jump.

  • Presumed Guilty

    My new FT column is up. Shakespeare, copyright, Scott Turow and a shadowy group of law professors..  What could be more fun? Ungated version after the jump. 

  • Waiting for ‘Waiting for Godot’

    What Could Have Been Entering the Public Domain on January 1, 2011?
    read more

  • Fantasy & Reality in Intellectual Property Policy

    My new column for the FT is up.  It deals with the incredible weakness of the data on which our intellectual property policy proceeds.   Ungated version after the jump

  • CBC Radio Interview on the History of Copyright

    Nora Young and the folk at CBC’s Spark have done it again, with a really nicely presented episode that includes a feature on copyright.  Nora interviews me about the history of copyright…  in 5 minutes.

  • EFF Pioneer Award Video

    Is here. I appear at 3:25 or so.

  • EFF Party in San Francisco!

    On November 8th, Cory Doctorow, John Perry Barlow, and numerous other digital luminaries will be gathering at the Minna Gallery in San Francisco for the EFF’s Pioneer Awards Party.  Cory is going to be the MC and — when not featured on XKCD blogging from a ballon in a red cape and goggles…

  • Net Neutrality Debate

    Great hour long radio show on net neutrality from NPR’s The State of Things.  Me, the inimitable Paul Jones of iBiblio, and Ryan Radia of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.  Frank Stasio is just a great interviewer.  Listen to it here

  • Op Art Comic in todays SF Chronicle

    We have a centerfold Op Art comic on “Copyright’s Futures”  in today’s San Francisco Chronicle.  The comic is

  • Why I Miss Justice Blackmun…

    This isn’t a post about intellectual property or the networked society, so if your interests only run that far, cease reading here.  In the late 80′s and early 90′s refugees were attempting to escape what was, in a decidedly non metaphorical sense, a hellish situation in Haiti..

  • Why We Need a Digital Civil Society

    Nitya Rajan interviewed me at Orgcon about why the legislative process malfunctions particularly badly on digital policy, and what the creation of civil society groups could do to fix that.  Video after the jump.

  • Who Steals the Gene from Off the Common

    My new Financial Times column on the creation of a science commons is now up.  For the ungated version, read on…

  • What if the Web Really Worked For Science?

    Here is the video of my speech in Vienna at the IRF symposium.  The title was What If the Web Really Worked for Science? Reimagining Data Policy and Intellectual Property.

  • Is Google Naive, Crafty or Stupid?

    I just started writing a column for the Huffington Post.  (I will still be writing for the FT.)  My first column is on the Google-Verizon announcement.  Not the “what” but the “why?”

  • Follow thepublicdomain on Twitter.



    Get my new book

    the book

    › Buy the book on Amazon
    › Download the book