Google Books and the Escape from the Black Hole

My newest FT column

They call it the 20th century black hole and it lives up to its name.  Huge quantities of matter are drawn by an overwhelming force into an inaccessible vortex from which not even light can escape.    Except here, the overwhelming force is copyright law and the stuff  relentlessly sucked into an inaccessible center is our collective culture.

That culture includes the 20th century books that Google wants to make available under something called the Book Search Settlement.  But not everyone agrees.

Once upon a time, 3 things held true.  Copyrights were relatively short.  You had to renew them (most people did not.) You didn’t get one unless you asked.  Now none of those holds true. Copyright can last for over 100 years. The result?  The great libraries of the world are full of books that are a.) still under copyright  b.) commercially unavailable and, in many cases, c.) “orphan works” with no copyright holder we can find.  Copyright has exhausted its function yet the works remain trapped in our cultural black hole.

Enter Google.  Google began digitizing some of the great libraries of the world (with their permission.) Copyright holders who did not want their works indexed could opt out.  Now those libraries could be searched. Google made the public domain works available in full for free.  (Try it.  The Library of Alexandria on your desktop.)  The copyrighted works are only shown in snippet view.  You can see a few words surrounding your search. If the book is what you wanted you can try to purchase it or find it in a library.   Some publishers’ and authors’ representatives objected and a lawsuit was filed.  In my view, Google had a very good argument that the scanning was “fair use.”  We may never know because, before the trial, a proposed settlement was reached with a group of publishers and with the Author’s Guild. It still allows copyright holders to opt out of being included in the index. Those works that remain will now be available for digital reading online, on payment of a fee.  The majority of the money from sales and advertising will be put into a central fund and distributed to authors and publishers.  In other words, we would have a way to get access to the 20th century black hole — to search and read all those commercially unavailable or orphan works. Authors would get paid for works that otherwise were commercially unavailable. Libraries would get free access on a single machine in each library.   That agreement now has to be okayed by a Federal judge — who has just extended the deadline for objections.

The settlement is long and complex. The objections are too.  Some authors wanted an opt in system, rather than opt out.  But an opt in system, by definition, would not include all the orphans. Others, rightly, cast doubt on whether the  organizations that brought the suit  represented all the interests involved.  Google’s competitors in the search business are particularly aggrieved. To me, the most powerful objections came from those with an undoubted commitment to breaking free of the black hole,  digital library pioneers and civil libertarians.  While they were delighted at the promise of greater access, they pointed out numerous troubling aspects of the agreement.  Google would have an effective monopoly over the index and in particular, over those commercially unavailable works in the black hole.  No one author or publisher could compete and no other search company would have negotiated Google’s immunity from suit.  Since you cannot download the copyrighted books, only read them online, Google holds the keys to your library and can monitor your reading.  The privacy protections it promised did not satisfy everyone.  A series of  briefs have been filed with the court objecting to the settlement and proposing extensive revisions.

I agree with a lot of the criticisms.   Privacy protections could be improved, the monopoly point is a real one and the rights of libraries should be expanded.  Some of those points might be fixed before the agreement is ratified.  Others may need subsequent scrutiny by privacy and antitrust regulators.  Google has responded, persuasively, that many of the problems could be resolved if only we had a rational copyright law in the first place with a safe harbor for the use of orphan works.  The criticisms continue.

What if the critics prevail and no settlement can be reached?  I would prefer us to fix copyright law so these issues disappear.   But if we cannot do that, we need a second best solution.  Google’s escape module has flaws, lots of them, but it is  better than staying in the black hole.

http://twitter.com/thepublicdomain

James Boyle is William Neal Reynolds Professor of law at Duke Law School. His latest book, The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind is available online in full for free at http://thepublicdomain.org and at Google Book Search.

Sunday, September 6th, 2009 Uncategorized

6 Comments to Google Books and the Escape from the Black Hole

  1. Fact is that copyright law (and for that matter many other legal frameworks) are just not able for modern electronic and internet resources. Until such time as we go back and bring the fundamentals up to speed we will go around in ever decreasing circles – and you know where that leads!

    Chris Warren
    Author and Freelance Writer
    Randolph’s Challenge Book One – The Pendulum Swings

  2. Chris Warren on September 7th, 2009
  3. My writeup here. Except that I don’t use code words like “safe harbor” or “fix copyright”. I state explicitly that the duration of copyright needs to be shorter.

    Any chance that you might install a comment previewer?

  4. Mockingbird on September 7th, 2009
  5. [...] Without the settlement and/or legal reform, we risk having what James Boyle called a “20th century black hole” for [...]

  6. Google Book settlement: Alternatives and alterations « Everybody’s Libraries on September 17th, 2009
  7. [...] settlement. Academics have also voiced their concern, two pieces by the always incisive James Boyle here and here; or James Grimmelman’s excellent opinion [...]

  8. Google Book Settlement on standby « TechnoLlama on September 24th, 2009
  9. [...] Jamie Boyle, o pai da ecologia digital, conta que em um tempo distante… tínhamos 3 situações. O tempo de proteção das obras era curto, o registro para proteção da obra tinha que ser renovado (o que a maioria não fazia), e o tal registro nem chegava a existir a não ser que fosse solicitado. Hoje tudo é bem diferente. Os períodos de proteção automática a direitos autorais podem durar mais de 100 anos. O resultado? As grandes bibliotecas do mundo estão abarrotadas de livros que: (1) ainda estão protegidos, (2) estão comercialmente indisponíveis e, na maioria dos casos, (3) são obras órfãs sem qualquer detentor de direitos com quem negociar. [...]

  10. Cultura Digital » Sobre o ‘acordo Google Books’, ou de porque precisamos atualizar a lei de direito autoral on January 25th, 2010
  11. [...] cual hay quienes ven en el acuerdo la posibilidad de que parte de la cultura del siglo XX escape al agujero negro en que habría quedado sumida, provocado por la prolongación de los plazos de protección de la [...]

  12. El futuro del libro 9. El acuerdo sobre Google Books « IT Ruminations on February 28th, 2011

From the Blog

  • “We Need To Start Seeing Other Futures..”

    Today is the second day of “Copyright Week!” Talk about a lede. That sentence has all the inherent excitement of “Periodontal Health Awareness Week” or “‘Hug Your Proctologist! No, After He’s Washed His Hands’ Week.” And that’s a shame. Copyright Week is a week devoted to our relationship with our own culture. Hint: things aren’t going well. The relationship is on the rocks.

  • Discussion: “The Foolish War Against Song-Lyric Websites”

    Professor Alex Sayf Cummings, author of a fascinating book called Democracy of Sound: Music Piracy and the Remaking of American Copyright in the 20th Century (recommended as a  thought-provoking read)  has an interesting  post up about attempts to shut down music lyric sites such as Rapgenius.com.

  • The Top Ten List of a Conference Planner

    Academics (and others) arrange conferences.  Perfectly normal people are invited to those conferences to speak.  Most of them are just as charming as can be… but then there are the special ones.  This Top 10 List of the special people one has to respond to is devoted to all conference planners everywhere.  Hold your heads up high.  After this, purgatory should be a snap.

  • (EM)I Has A Dream

    EM(I) Has A DreamAugust 28th, 2013 is the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. The copyright in the speech is administered by EMI, with the consent of the King family. Thus the speech may not be freely played on video or reproduced and costlessly distributed across the nation — even today. Its transient appearance depends on the copyright owner’s momentary sufferance, not public right. It may disappear from your video library tomorrow. It has even been licensed to advertise commercial products, including cars and mobile phone plans.

  • The Prosecution of Aaron: A Response to Orin Kerr

    Aaron Swartz committed suicide last week.  He was 26, a genius and my friend.  Not a really good friend, but someone I had worked with off and on for 11 years, liked a lot, had laughed with frequently, occasionally shaken my head over and deeply admired.

  • The Hargreaves Review

    An Intellectual Property System for the Internet Age

    James Boyle

    In November 2010, the Prime Minister commissioned a review of the Britain’s intellectual property laws and their effect on economic growth, quoting the founders of Google that “they could never have started their company in Britain” because of a lack of flexibility in British copyright..  Mr. Cameron wanted to see if we could have UK intellectual property laws “fit for the Internet age.”   Today the Review will be published. Its conclusion?  “Could it be true that laws designed more than three centuries ago with the express purpose of creating economic incentives for innovation by protecting creators’ rights are today obstructing innovation and economic growth?  The short answer is: yes.” Those words are from Professor Ian Hargreaves, head of the Review.   (Full disclosure: I was on the Review’s panel of expert advisors.)

  • Keith Aoki — A Remembrance Book

    A slideshow and downloadable book remembering Keith in words and pictures.  You can order a glossy, high quality copy of the book itself here from Createspace or here from Amazon.  We tried to make it as beautiful as something Keith would create.  We failed. But we came close; have a look at how striking it is… all because of Keith’s art.

  • Now THAT is how you teach a class

  • RIP, Keith Aoki

    Our friend, colleague, co-author and brilliant artist and scholar Keith Aoki died yesterday in his house in Sacramento.  He was 55 years old.

  • The Future of the Constitution?

    The Brookings Institution has organized a volume on “The Future of the Constitution” edited by Jeff Rosen and Benjamin Wittes and featuring articles by me, Larry Lessig, Jonathan Zittrain, Tim Wu and many others.  How will our constitutional tradition deal with the challenges posed by new technologies?  The topics range from possible personhood claims by artificial intelligences, to the future of free speech and the Net, to neuroscience and criminal punishment.  The essays are freely available online. Details after the jump.

  • Presumed Guilty

    My new FT column is up. Shakespeare, copyright, Scott Turow and a shadowy group of law professors..  What could be more fun? Ungated version after the jump. 

  • Waiting for ‘Waiting for Godot’

    What Could Have Been Entering the Public Domain on January 1, 2011?
    read more

  • Fantasy & Reality in Intellectual Property Policy

    My new column for the FT is up.  It deals with the incredible weakness of the data on which our intellectual property policy proceeds.   Ungated version after the jump

  • CBC Radio Interview on the History of Copyright

    Nora Young and the folk at CBC’s Spark have done it again, with a really nicely presented episode that includes a feature on copyright.  Nora interviews me about the history of copyright…  in 5 minutes.

  • EFF Pioneer Award Video

    Is here. I appear at 3:25 or so.

  • EFF Party in San Francisco!

    On November 8th, Cory Doctorow, John Perry Barlow, and numerous other digital luminaries will be gathering at the Minna Gallery in San Francisco for the EFF’s Pioneer Awards Party.  Cory is going to be the MC and — when not featured on XKCD blogging from a ballon in a red cape and goggles…

  • Net Neutrality Debate

    Great hour long radio show on net neutrality from NPR’s The State of Things.  Me, the inimitable Paul Jones of iBiblio, and Ryan Radia of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.  Frank Stasio is just a great interviewer.  Listen to it here

  • Op Art Comic in todays SF Chronicle

    We have a centerfold Op Art comic on “Copyright’s Futures”  in today’s San Francisco Chronicle.  The comic is

  • Why I Miss Justice Blackmun…

    This isn’t a post about intellectual property or the networked society, so if your interests only run that far, cease reading here.  In the late 80′s and early 90′s refugees were attempting to escape what was, in a decidedly non metaphorical sense, a hellish situation in Haiti..

  • Why We Need a Digital Civil Society

    Nitya Rajan interviewed me at Orgcon about why the legislative process malfunctions particularly badly on digital policy, and what the creation of civil society groups could do to fix that.  Video after the jump.

  • Who Steals the Gene from Off the Common

    My new Financial Times column on the creation of a science commons is now up.  For the ungated version, read on…

  • What if the Web Really Worked For Science?

    Here is the video of my speech in Vienna at the IRF symposium.  The title was What If the Web Really Worked for Science? Reimagining Data Policy and Intellectual Property.

  • Is Google Naive, Crafty or Stupid?

    I just started writing a column for the Huffington Post.  (I will still be writing for the FT.)  My first column is on the Google-Verizon announcement.  Not the “what” but the “why?”

  • Video of ORGCON keynote

    The Open Rights Group held its first big conference — ORGCON — in London last month and I was really honoured to give the keynote.  The Twitter cascade behind me, however,

  • Er… Bigfoot? Really?

    If one gets a lot of e-mail, one will eventually get very strange e-mail, but there is a frontier; an event horizon of bizarreness, that one doesn’t expect to be surpassed.  But life is richer than that.

  • Follow thepublicdomain on Twitter.

    Comic

    read

    Get my new book

    the book


    › Buy the book on Amazon
    › Download the book